Injury Risk Management Research Centre, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Correspondence Lori Mooren, University of New South Wales - Injury Risk Management Research Centre, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia E-mail: lori.mooren@unsw.edu.au
Received
13 July 2009
Revised
02 October 2009
Accepted
27 October 2009
Abstract Much to the frustration of road safety researchers, practitioners and advocates, road deaths and injuries have not been widely accepted as a major public health threat. Currently, road trauma is one of the biggest killers and causes of serious and disabling injuries in the world. While there has been considerable research on the causes of road injury and ways of mitigating the problem, there is still reluctance to systematically and sufficiently do what can be done to reduce this problem globally.
This paper takes an historical review of the road trauma problem and responses to it. In examining developments in road transport and road injury, it is clear that the main impediment to reducing road deaths and injury has been a misguided preference of economic advancement over public health risk management.
It is misguided because road trauma has impeded and does still impede the capacity of economies to develop. The challenge for societies now is to look at this false dichotomy, that of road development and motorisation versus road safety, and begin to make the right choices in favour of human society advancement through the development and management of safe road-traffic systems.
A new 'Safe Systems' approach is emerging in Australia and spreading globally as a guiding principle for road safety. The evolution of this approach is traced and illustrated in this article. The need for finding ways to engender a stronger global political commitment to road safety is demonstrated.
You need to be registered and logged-in with the Forum to posts a comment.
Reader comments are moderated after posting. If you find something offensive or inappropriate, you can click 'Report this comment to moderator'. For controversial topics, we reserve the rights to remove published comments.
Comments
